Map What Exists
We list the systems in play, where each piece of data is created, and where it stops. Most integration briefs change once the actual data flow is on paper.
Custom integrations, APIs, CRM connection, lead tracking systems, admin dashboards, internal systems, and marketing tools.
Most integration work is not exotic. It is making two systems that were never designed to talk agree on what a customer is, and making sure the connection keeps working when one of them changes.
Connections between platforms that ship no integration of their own — REST and webhook endpoints, authentication, retries for when the other side is down, and error handling that tells someone rather than failing quietly.
Leads written into your CRM with the campaign, source and identifier attached, deduplicated against what is already there, and mapped to fields your sales team actually uses instead of dumped into a notes box.
Admin views that pull from the systems of record rather than from a spreadsheet someone updates by hand. Access controls, filters that match how your team asks questions, and numbers you can trace back to their source.
Event and conversion tracking implemented end to end — browser events, server-side events where the platform supports them, and consistent identifiers so the same conversion is not counted twice or missed entirely.
Small purpose-built tools for the work that currently runs on manual copy-paste: bulk operations, approval screens, record lookups, exports. Built for the people who use them daily rather than as a general-purpose platform.
Routing and automation between systems — assign a lead, notify the right channel, update a status, trigger a follow-up. Rules written down and visible, so behaviour can be changed without reverse-engineering the code.
The pattern is consistent. Leads land in one place — a form handler, a Telegram bot, a WhatsApp inbox, a spreadsheet. Spend sits in the ad platforms. Whether a lead turned into revenue lives in the CRM, or in an accounting system, or in someone's head. Each system is individually correct and none of them can answer the only question that matters: which spend produced which revenue.
So the numbers stop agreeing. The ad platform reports conversions the CRM has never heard of, because the platform counted a form view or attributed a conversion to a click that the sales team recorded under a different name. The CRM shows customers with no source, because the source field was optional and nobody filled it in. Reporting becomes an argument about whose number is right, and budget decisions get made on the one that is easiest to pull.
Closing that loop takes three things, and skipping any one of them leaves the gap open.
The first is consistent identifiers. Every lead needs an ID generated at the point of capture and carried through every system it touches — into the CRM, onto the deal record, into the conversion sent back to the ad platform. Matching on email or phone number alone breaks the moment someone types a different address or changes their number.
The second is server-side events. Browser tracking loses data to ad blockers, privacy settings, dropped connections and cross-device journeys. Sending conversions from your server — with the click identifier the platform gave you at the start — reports the events that actually happened rather than the ones that survived the browser. It also lets you report the conversion that matters, the qualified lead or the paid order, rather than the form submission that may go nowhere.
The third is a single source of truth. One system has to be the one that is right about a customer's status, and every other view has to read from it. Without that decision you get reconciliation work forever, because two systems are both allowed to be authoritative and they will eventually disagree.
None of this is a large build in most cases. It is usually a handful of connections and one decision about which system wins. What makes it expensive is leaving it until after a year of spend has gone out untracked.
We list the systems in play, where each piece of data is created, and where it stops. Most integration briefs change once the actual data flow is on paper.
Which system is authoritative, what identifier ties records together, and which events count as a conversion. Decided and written down before anything is built.
Connections built, then tested with real records end to end — a lead submitted at the front, followed through every system, and checked against what each one reports.
Failures alert someone instead of going silent. As platforms change their APIs, connections get updated, and new systems attach to a model that already exists.
Hosting, credentials and handover arrangements depend on the systems involved and are agreed before work starts. Message us on Telegram and we will go through what your integration would require.
Usually yes. If it has an API or accepts webhooks, it can be connected. If it is closed or the API is limited, there are still options — scheduled imports, an intermediate database, or a middleware layer — but they are less reliable than a direct connection and we will tell you that up front rather than after the invoice.
Browser tracking only reports what the browser allowed through. Ad blockers, privacy settings, cookie restrictions and dropped connections all remove events, and cross-device journeys break attribution entirely. Server-side sending reports from your own systems, so the event is recorded whether or not the browser cooperated. It also lets you send the conversion that matters commercially — a qualified lead or a paid order — rather than a form submission that may never become revenue.
Platforms deprecate versions and change field requirements, so eventually something needs updating. We build with error handling and alerting so a broken connection announces itself instead of silently dropping records for weeks. That is the difference between a maintenance task and discovering a quarter of your leads are missing.
Yes, and it is often the better arrangement. They know the internal systems, we handle the marketing and tracking side, and the mapping is agreed between both. We work to whatever review and deployment process you already have rather than asking you to change it for us.
We ask for the narrowest permissions an integration actually needs, and nothing beyond that. The specific arrangement depends on which systems are involved and how they authenticate, so we go through exactly what access is required before anything is connected. Message us on Telegram and we will walk you through it for your setup.
It depends entirely on how many systems are involved and how cooperative their APIs are. Connecting a form to one CRM is a small job; reconciling four systems with no shared identifier is not. We scope it after mapping what exists, and we would rather tell you a real number then than quote a low one and revise it later.
Message 老虎哥 on Telegram. Share your offer, target country, platform, KPI, and current problem. We can arrange an online meeting and propose the best solution.